Here's a welcome site by one voice with the guts to take a public stand. We cheer this effort! Proud of having a job and believing in a brand. Read the site, it should make you feel great about even one person can make a difference.
Podcast – BA's A318 plans for London City-NYC
By IAG | February 1st, 2008 | Posted in a318, airbus, british airways, london, podcast | No CommentsListen here
British Airways and Open Skies
By IAG | January 16th, 2008 | Posted in british airways, podcast | No CommentsIn a fairly long podcast (~21 minutes) we have a conversation with Doug McVitie from Arran Aerospace in Paris and Timothy O'Neil-Dunne from T2Impact in Seattle discussing British Airways' new airline.
Review of BA's recent fleet update order
By IAG | October 3rd, 2007 | Posted in airbus, boeing, british airways | No CommentsA passenger's lament
By IAG | July 13th, 2007 | Posted in british airways, ife | No CommentsThe round trip LAX-LHR-CPT is far by anyone's reckoning. BA is a good airline as airlines go. But my most recent experience was not especially gratifying. On such long flights the importance of IFE rises by the mile, and there were a lot of those. Would you believe that all four legs had IFE trouble?
Only on the very last one yesterday did BA staff hand out the form you see above (front & back). The flight from CPT had no IFE whatsoever; "we aplogise for the inconvenience"; yeah, I'd say so. Then the LAX leg had video but with awful white noise – like the CPT flight, frequent system re-boots had no effect. There is no longer flight in the world than when some people have IFE that works (kinda) and you have squat.
Sending in this letter – read it and see what it offers – means what? Nada. There is nothing that comes out of it at all. Nothing on the document indicates a customer is compensated. BA took 100c on the dollar; perhaps some sort of compensation would be appropriate. But look at the mealy mouthed words. There is nothing that indicates I could get anything other than another letter. For goodness sake – this is BA! Once upon a time the "World's favorite airline".
To be fair, IFE breaks down all the time and BA (and others) need to get the technology suppliers butts on the line. BA's brand suffered on every flight I was on. Mutterings were all around – "I'll never fly this airline again, it happens all the time". The poor crew cannot do anything as they are not techies. And the miles keep coming, the broken IFE stares back you mocking your aching butt, throbbing legs and twisting feet. (By the way, who is the idiot who designs a coach seat that only marginally supports a thigh? On a long haul this causes pain. I want a name.)
If ever there was a trip that guaranteed my next tech investment to be a iPOD video or equivalent, this was it. Anything to ensure I don't have to watch "normal" TV sitcoms and movies with four letter words (desperately hoping my 12 year old son is not watching it too between hisses pops and system crashes) and unspeakable violence. One watching of the Sparta movie was enough to satisfy any bloody minded cannibal for a year. In case you ever wonder where passengers get their violent outbursts from, you might find a connection with the IFE content.
Crap poured into a brain tied to a seat and a body that cannot move. Sounds like a perfect opportunity to create a violent outburst. Perhaps BA might consider offering sedatives along with those little cans of soda. At least on US airlines they use full size cans. While writing this is cathartic because it allows for letting off steam, it is also a plea to BA and all airlines. PLEASE fix your IFE!
Its going to take me weeks before I can face another overseas trip. Or until I save enough for that iPod video. Hmm, maybe I can get one on eBay cheap.
By the way, its not just me who feels this way.
A passenger's lament
By IAG | July 13th, 2007 | Posted in british airways, ife | No CommentsThe round trip LAX-LHR-CPT is far by anyone's reckoning. BA is a good airline as airlines go. But my most recent experience was not especially gratifying. On such long flights the importance of IFE rises by the mile, and there were a lot of those. Would you believe that all four legs had IFE trouble?
Only on the very last one yesterday did BA staff hand out the form you see above (front & back). The flight from CPT had no IFE whatsoever; "we aplogise for the inconvenience"; yeah, I'd say so. Then the LAX leg had video but with awful white noise – like the CPT flight, frequent system re-boots had no effect. There is no longer flight in the world than when some people have IFE that works (kinda) and you have squat.
Sending in this letter – read it and see what it offers – means what? Nada. There is nothing that comes out of it at all. Nothing on the document indicates a customer is compensated. BA took 100c on the dollar; perhaps some sort of compensation would be appropriate. But look at the mealy mouthed words. There is nothing that indicates I could get anything other than another letter. For goodness sake – this is BA! Once upon a time the "World's favorite airline".
To be fair, IFE breaks down all the time and BA (and others) need to get the technology suppliers butts on the line. BA's brand suffered on every flight I was on. Mutterings were all around – "I'll never fly this airline again, it happens all the time". The poor crew cannot do anything as they are not techies. And the miles keep coming, the broken IFE stares back you mocking your aching butt, throbbing legs and twisting feet. (By the way, who is the idiot who designs a coach seat that only marginally supports a thigh? On a long haul this causes pain. I want a name.)
If ever there was a trip that guaranteed my next tech investment to be a iPOD video or equivalent, this was it. Anything to ensure I don't have to watch "normal" TV sitcoms and movies with four letter words (desperately hoping my 12 year old son is not watching it too between hisses pops and system crashes) and unspeakable violence. One watching of the Sparta movie was enough to satisfy any bloody minded cannibal for a year. In case you ever wonder where passengers get their violent outbursts from, you might find a connection with the IFE content.
Crap poured into a brain tied to a seat and a body that cannot move. Sounds like a perfect opportunity to create a violent outburst. Perhaps BA might consider offering sedatives along with those little cans of soda. At least on US airlines they use full size cans. While writing this is cathartic because it allows for letting off steam, it is also a plea to BA and all airlines. PLEASE fix your IFE!
Its going to take me weeks before I can face another overseas trip. Or until I save enough for that iPod video. Hmm, maybe I can get one on eBay cheap.
By the way, its not just me who feels this way.
BA and TPG go for Iberia
By IAG | May 11th, 2007 | Posted in british airways, iberia, tpg | No CommentsBA and EC consolidation
By IAG | May 1st, 2007 | Posted in british airways, heathrow, open skies | No CommentsDelta gets Heathrow slots
By IAG | April 16th, 2007 | Posted in british airways, Delta Air Lines, heathrow, skyteam, virgin atlantic | No Comments- How big a deal is this?
- It is a smart move for the slot sellers.
- Because they get cash now plus access to the US from Heathrow operated by Delta.
- British Airways' service to Atlanta is now much less compelling, while all airlines flying to New York will see a ratcheting up of competition.
More on Blackprogram
BA makes a move – at last
By IAG | March 30th, 2007 | Posted in 747, 777, 787, a380, airbus, bmi, boeing, british airways, heathrow | No CommentsBritain's Sunday Times reports that BA has done a deal with bmi for 51 slots per week for £30m. Analysts at ABN Amro today published research suggesting that flights across the Atlantic account for 65% of BA’s profits, and that open skies could see profits from those routes fall by between 25 to 53%. The decline in profits may be high – other numbers estimate 10-15% which may be more accurate, but nobody can be sure.
The airport’s two runways operate at 98.5% capacity. Consequently the price paid by BA is cheap because slots have traded for £10m before. BMI recently bought a British Mediterranean Airways, a BA franchise airline, for £30m, so the amount seems to have gone around, bmi picking up British Mediterranean (a BA franchise airline). Conveniently BA says the deals have nothing to do with each. Whatever.
The need for these slots is interesting. It may indicate what BA’s thinking is in terms of its fleet renewal. BA is going to have a bigger fight on its hands; it will be competing with United, Delta, Continental and US Airways. American is a token ally. To date it has competed with American and United at Heathrow. So the newcomers are going to complicate matters. BA will therefore have to deal with this head on.
What makes sense now? It appears BA might be going for a higher frequency response than bigger planes. With these extra slots, BA could be a much more attractive option for business travelers because it could offer higher frequencies. For example, it could offer many more flights to New York than either Delta or American could. If a business traveler has an option of a dozen flights per day each way, and BA accounts for more than 50%, it stands to reason that BA will pick up more traffic. Given the fact that fares are rising fast, and business travel has picked up big time, BA could reap great rewards.
And what of BA’s fleet plans? Many slots mean many planes. Nobody wastes slots at Heathrow – or at least no rational airline does. There are exceptions. However, it would seem that an increase in slots points to 787s nipping across the Atlantic almost hourly in BA colors.
Where do large planes fit into this scenario? BA has over 50 747s and many of its routes will continue to require “heavy” lift. So a large aircraft continues to play a role. But in the American market we might see a greater focus on frequencies rather than big planes – essentially moving the same number of seats while providing more schedule choice. We might see cities like San Diego get BA service again because a 787 would be much more efficient than a 777 in secondary markets. Other cities might gain new service too, Cincinnati for example. Consequently it appears to us that BA will use smaller planes to the US.
By the way, if we are correct in this analysis, then we see Airbus as out of the picture in terms of the A330/A350. It cannot deliver fast enough to exploit the new slots. However on the larger planes, the A380 cannot be counted out yet (we think).
By the way this deal would make SAS' attempt to sell its stake a lot tougher wouldn't you say? One has to wonder how the fellows at Lufthansa see this deal.




