You are currently browsing the archives for the eads category.

Subscribe


iagBlog Archives

 

iagBlog Categories

Latest iagTweets

Follow Us | Twitter RSS

USAF might buy "mixed" tanker fleet

In what may be a solution worthy of King Solomon, the USAF likely would seek to buy planes from both Boeing and Northrop Grumman, the top Air Force general said Wednesday.

As you read the linked story note the word use – some utility in a mixed fleet; a continual set of opportunities. To us this means Boeing likely gets the nod this time around and maybe net time the KC-30 team.

But his last statement "Lifecycle cost has to be as low as we can get it with the most capable airplane we can get" is really interesting. This one seems to favor the KC-30.

The truth may be that the USAF has to buy some KC-30s, sooner rather than later. That way the USAF keeps Boeing's prices very sharp. It also ensures the USAF has a choice of vendors. Isn't it amazing that this puts the USAF in the same place as many airlines? They all need Airbus to remain an effective airframe maker. Without it, Boeing becomes a monopoly which nobody wants. Airbus, despite its current woes, will get through its problems because those who fly planes need them.

USAF might buy "mixed" tanker fleet

In what may be a solution worthy of King Solomon, the USAF likely would seek to buy planes from both Boeing and Northrop Grumman, the top Air Force general said Wednesday.

As you read the linked story note the word use – some utility in a mixed fleet; a continual set of opportunities. To us this means Boeing likely gets the nod this time around and maybe net time the KC-30 team.

But his last statement "Lifecycle cost has to be as low as we can get it with the most capable airplane we can get" is really interesting. This one seems to favor the KC-30.

The truth may be that the USAF has to buy some KC-30s, sooner rather than later. That way the USAF keeps Boeing's prices very sharp. It also ensures the USAF has a choice of vendors. Isn't it amazing that this puts the USAF in the same place as many airlines? They all need Airbus to remain an effective airframe maker. Without it, Boeing becomes a monopoly which nobody wants. Airbus, despite its current woes, will get through its problems because those who fly planes need them.

Airbus UK in play?

We hear that Vought, Spirit, Finmeccanica and GKN are considering a bid for Airbus UK. Understandably, no details yet. But if you notice more muted British political noise about Airbus' UK plant closures you might suspect that these plants may have a future under a different brand. With so much attention on the Franco-German spat, Airbus UK has moved out of the limelight.

The firms mentioned above are involved with the 787 program, deeply so. If they see value in Aibus UK's assets what does that say about other European aerospace firms? Is there something Airbus and EADS are not seeing or ignoring? Whatever the case is, Airbus UK is strong on wing design and has lots of clever engineers. Moreover, even with the UK government financing research to help its domestic Airbus factories would it not be delicious irony if that investment ended up helping Boeing?

But there is more. Mr. Putin has announced plans to keep building the Russian stake in EADS. Such a move will be destabilizing on a number of fronts (control motives, balance, defense, etc). After Qatar's announced interest in an EADS stake, Airbus seems to becoming less and less European by the day. We also understand Mr. Gallois might be tiring of his role at Airbus. Can't say we blame him.

Airbus UK in play?

We hear that Vought, Spirit, Finmeccanica and GKN are considering a bid for Airbus UK. Understandably, no details yet. But if you notice more muted British political noise about Airbus' UK plant closures you might suspect that these plants may have a future under a different brand. With so much attention on the Franco-German spat, Airbus UK has moved out of the limelight.

The firms mentioned above are involved with the 787 program, deeply so. If they see value in Aibus UK's assets what does that say about other European aerospace firms? Is there something Airbus and EADS are not seeing or ignoring? Whatever the case is, Airbus UK is strong on wing design and has lots of clever engineers. Moreover, even with the UK government financing research to help its domestic Airbus factories would it not be delicious irony if that investment ended up helping Boeing?

But there is more. Mr. Putin has announced plans to keep building the Russian stake in EADS. Such a move will be destabilizing on a number of fronts (control motives, balance, defense, etc). After Qatar's announced interest in an EADS stake, Airbus seems to becoming less and less European by the day. We also understand Mr. Gallois might be tiring of his role at Airbus. Can't say we blame him.

COMMUNICATION ON POWER 8

Take notice of the word use in the second paragraph. M. Gallois uses the word "I" a lot. Is there perhaps an absence of cordiality? In seems our earlier piece using the word "Apocalypse" was not excessively dramatic.

The official EADS press release:
"Yesterday evening, February 18th, the Board of EADS interrupted its work on Power 8. The meeting will be resumed within the next days to find an agreement regarding the cross-national sharing of the industrial workload related to the A350 XWB. Consequently, the Airbus European Works Council “ECA” meeting planned on February 20th has been postponed.

Louis Gallois, CEO of Airbus, underlined “the need to very quickly find a solution that overcomes national issues. I made proposals which I deem balanced, both from an industrial and a technological point of view, and which serve our objective of economic competitiveness,” he said. “I wish that they can lead to the consensus we urgently need. Airbus cannot delay any longer implementing Power 8. Quite naturally, employees are eager to know how the future of their Company together with their own future is being shaped”.

COMMUNICATION ON POWER 8

Take notice of the word use in the second paragraph. M. Gallois uses the word "I" a lot. Is there perhaps an absence of cordiality? In seems our earlier piece using the word "Apocalypse" was not excessively dramatic.

The official EADS press release:
"Yesterday evening, February 18th, the Board of EADS interrupted its work on Power 8. The meeting will be resumed within the next days to find an agreement regarding the cross-national sharing of the industrial workload related to the A350 XWB. Consequently, the Airbus European Works Council “ECA” meeting planned on February 20th has been postponed.

Louis Gallois, CEO of Airbus, underlined “the need to very quickly find a solution that overcomes national issues. I made proposals which I deem balanced, both from an industrial and a technological point of view, and which serve our objective of economic competitiveness,” he said. “I wish that they can lead to the consensus we urgently need. Airbus cannot delay any longer implementing Power 8. Quite naturally, employees are eager to know how the future of their Company together with their own future is being shaped”.

EADS and Qatar getting together?

Hot rumor coming out from Europe and Middle East that Qatar is about to take a 10% stake in EADS. Apparently news might break by 3pm PST today.

This will secure Qatar Airways' A350 and A380 orders, and displace Emirates as the key Airbus customer in the Middle East. (Nice move) Obviously it provides EADS with much-needed funds and opens up a new financial channel for future capital – potentially blocking the Russians? This infusion helps offset bad news from the upcoming EADS 2006 results. Spin on this story is going to be awesome.

The Franco-German balance should be stable although we understand influence is swinging towards Germany. This infusion of capital might mitigate against the harsher elements of Power 8. But that depends on an announcement today or at least before the February 22.

We expect EADS' share price to jump tomorrow – the US markets are closed.

There is a quid pro quo of course. EADS and Airbus will irritate Emirates with this move and so virtually guarantee Emirates will select the 787 rather than the A350 for its upcoming 100-aircraft order. We understand that Emirates might be incensed enough to make a bid for British Airways. This has been rumored often over the past six months. Clearly such a move ruins any sales campaign at BA for Airbus for a very long time. Fascinating times as the dust clears and we see where everyone stands.

EADS and Qatar getting together?

Hot rumor coming out from Europe and Middle East that Qatar is about to take a 10% stake in EADS. Apparently news might break by 3pm PST today.

This will secure Qatar Airways' A350 and A380 orders, and displace Emirates as the key Airbus customer in the Middle East. (Nice move) Obviously it provides EADS with much-needed funds and opens up a new financial channel for future capital – potentially blocking the Russians? This infusion helps offset bad news from the upcoming EADS 2006 results. Spin on this story is going to be awesome.

The Franco-German balance should be stable although we understand influence is swinging towards Germany. This infusion of capital might mitigate against the harsher elements of Power 8. But that depends on an announcement today or at least before the February 22.

We expect EADS' share price to jump tomorrow – the US markets are closed.

There is a quid pro quo of course. EADS and Airbus will irritate Emirates with this move and so virtually guarantee Emirates will select the 787 rather than the A350 for its upcoming 100-aircraft order. We understand that Emirates might be incensed enough to make a bid for British Airways. This has been rumored often over the past six months. Clearly such a move ruins any sales campaign at BA for Airbus for a very long time. Fascinating times as the dust clears and we see where everyone stands.

EADS, Airbus and the coming of the Apocalypse

This week is going to be rough on EADS and Airbus. But rougher still for Europe's highly skilled aerospace workers. Airbus wants to cut $3.5bn in costs over the next four years and this could mean a 20% reduction in labor. This sounds like the first day at University, "Look to the left of you and look to the right of you, only one of you will be here next year". It is a highly unsettling experience for those who remember it.

The UK is likely to see a big hit with a probable closing of the Filton plant (2,000 jobs). The British government announced it would finance research into new computer-modelling techniques at several British universities. This could help Airbus speed up product development by as much as 90%; but its too late because Airbus needed this help years ago. Even so, the British are muttering about how they will express displeasure. We don't think it means much. The British are deeply committed to their A330 tankers and other Euro-projects like the Typhoon. Any British Airways orders will have no state influence. The British government is essentially playing an immensely weak hand. By not investing in its national aerospace infrastructure, Britain eviscerated its aerospace industry. So much the nation that brought us the Spitfire, Meteor, Comet, Concorde, etc. Its great aviation legacy has gone the way of its Empire.

In Germany the hit is likely to be much worse. Rumors of up to 10,000 job losses are swirling. Some of the UK jobs moving there could ease the pain, but not by enough for the German government. But here again the government has forced its banks and other state (lander) to get involved because it does not want to invest itself as Daimler Benz exits the industry. (following BAE's example) Whereas the UK has no real "bite" with Airbus, the Germans have "parity" with the French. This week we will see what that really means. The French state has no hesitation in doing whatever it needs to ensure its aviation industry stays in business. As we said, its going to be a rough week, with more rough weeks to follow.

EADS, Airbus and the coming of the Apocalypse

This week is going to be rough on EADS and Airbus. But rougher still for Europe's highly skilled aerospace workers. Airbus wants to cut $3.5bn in costs over the next four years and this could mean a 20% reduction in labor. This sounds like the first day at University, "Look to the left of you and look to the right of you, only one of you will be here next year". It is a highly unsettling experience for those who remember it.

The UK is likely to see a big hit with a probable closing of the Filton plant (2,000 jobs). The British government announced it would finance research into new computer-modelling techniques at several British universities. This could help Airbus speed up product development by as much as 90%; but its too late because Airbus needed this help years ago. Even so, the British are muttering about how they will express displeasure. We don't think it means much. The British are deeply committed to their A330 tankers and other Euro-projects like the Typhoon. Any British Airways orders will have no state influence. The British government is essentially playing an immensely weak hand. By not investing in its national aerospace infrastructure, Britain eviscerated its aerospace industry. So much the nation that brought us the Spitfire, Meteor, Comet, Concorde, etc. Its great aviation legacy has gone the way of its Empire.

In Germany the hit is likely to be much worse. Rumors of up to 10,000 job losses are swirling. Some of the UK jobs moving there could ease the pain, but not by enough for the German government. But here again the government has forced its banks and other state (lander) to get involved because it does not want to invest itself as Daimler Benz exits the industry. (following BAE's example) Whereas the UK has no real "bite" with Airbus, the Germans have "parity" with the French. This week we will see what that really means. The French state has no hesitation in doing whatever it needs to ensure its aviation industry stays in business. As we said, its going to be a rough week, with more rough weeks to follow.