You are currently browsing the archives for the in-flight communications category.

Subscribe


iagBlog Archives

 

iagBlog Categories

Latest iagTweets

Follow Us | Twitter RSS

BBC discovers in-flight Internet

Take look here. This is really great exposure for Row 44 – who could use this now. And what do you think the FIRST thing is that the BBC tried to do? Well of course make a call – a video call no less. So you see, dear readers, despite all the nonsense you read about in the press saying the in-flight calls will be obnoxious. Yet its the first thing the BBC tries to do. In-flight communications is irresistible.

Of course you want it! Don't listen to all the flight attendant fears and so on. The industry really fears, in this day of Facebook, Twitter and instant messages that you will capture all those stupid moments in-flight and publish them. Since you already know that every traveler has a funny story to tell, why not simply capture the moment and store it forever?

BBC discovers in-flight Internet

Take look here. This is really great exposure for Row 44 – who could use this now. And what do you think the FIRST thing is that the BBC tried to do? Well of course make a call – a video call no less. So you see, dear readers, despite all the nonsense you read about in the press saying the in-flight calls will be obnoxious. Yet its the first thing the BBC tries to do. In-flight communications is irresistible.

Of course you want it! Don't listen to all the flight attendant fears and so on. The industry really fears, in this day of Facebook, Twitter and instant messages that you will capture all those stupid moments in-flight and publish them. Since you already know that every traveler has a funny story to tell, why not simply capture the moment and store it forever?

Podcast – Picocells & WiFi in-flight

Podcast here

Southwest getting IFE/Internet?

Oh happy day! The perfect US airline to roll this out. Please, please let this be true and may it work well.

More on Blackprogram

Southwest getting IFE/Internet?

Oh happy day! The perfect US airline to roll this out. Please, please let this be true and may it work well.

More on Blackprogram

Yes, we wish we were in France, really

Reading this makes us green with envy. Imagine, in-flight communications for the masses. Its interesting that the French (with a vastly more refined history of manners than us Americans) are able to feel comfortable with in-flight phone service.

Could it be that French government gnomes are smarter than ours in America? Over here they won't even let us test the system! Oh, to be in France….(Now hiding under desk)

Yes, we wish we were in France, really

Reading this makes us green with envy. Imagine, in-flight communications for the masses. Its interesting that the French (with a vastly more refined history of manners than us Americans) are able to feel comfortable with in-flight phone service.

Could it be that French government gnomes are smarter than ours in America? Over here they won't even let us test the system! Oh, to be in France….(Now hiding under desk)

FCC crawls under a rock?

The "will they or won't they" saga involving the FCC, the FAA, airlines, mobile carriers continues. The Luddites are in the lead again, unfortunately.

A CTIA study suggesting that "picocells" on planes that enables ground communications with cell phones will not eliminate interference with ground towers, FCC Chairman Kevin Martin suggests that the Feds should delay lifting the in-flight calling ban. This type of communication has been approved in Europe and Australia. Maybe Iraq and Afghanistan will get this communications ability before we do. They seem to get a awful lot of our money already.

It seems some phones operate on frequencies that are not supported by the picocell. Absent this functionality, handsets can "interfere" with the ground stations miles below – the plane's systems are not impacted. The chairman's suggestion does not stop the FCC's commissioners from approving the move anyway. But you got to doubt this. There are many forces arraigned against improving time wasted in-flight. Luddites all of them.

Yes noisy people are a pain in the a*s. But the same thing applies on terra firma and there is not much we can do about it. The Luddites of course ignore the fact that the main use is DATA (dummies). Nobody (OK maybe a few) is that dumb to have private conversations in close proximity to strangers. There are tens of thousands more people who want to access their emails; quietly. So the thousands get nailed because of the potential idiots. This is a democratic process? Maybe we should ban driving because somebody might drink and drive?

Let's face it, if picocells are the problem, a technology fix will take care of it. But since we are talking about Washington, don't raise your hopes. Its easier to crawl under a stone and hope it all goes away. Don't you wonder about people with power over your life who are unelected? How can we get rid of these people? This is SO frustrating.

FCC crawls under a rock?

The "will they or won't they" saga involving the FCC, the FAA, airlines, mobile carriers continues. The Luddites are in the lead again, unfortunately.

A CTIA study suggesting that "picocells" on planes that enables ground communications with cell phones will not eliminate interference with ground towers, FCC Chairman Kevin Martin suggests that the Feds should delay lifting the in-flight calling ban. This type of communication has been approved in Europe and Australia. Maybe Iraq and Afghanistan will get this communications ability before we do. They seem to get a awful lot of our money already.

It seems some phones operate on frequencies that are not supported by the picocell. Absent this functionality, handsets can "interfere" with the ground stations miles below – the plane's systems are not impacted. The chairman's suggestion does not stop the FCC's commissioners from approving the move anyway. But you got to doubt this. There are many forces arraigned against improving time wasted in-flight. Luddites all of them.

Yes noisy people are a pain in the a*s. But the same thing applies on terra firma and there is not much we can do about it. The Luddites of course ignore the fact that the main use is DATA (dummies). Nobody (OK maybe a few) is that dumb to have private conversations in close proximity to strangers. There are tens of thousands more people who want to access their emails; quietly. So the thousands get nailed because of the potential idiots. This is a democratic process? Maybe we should ban driving because somebody might drink and drive?

Let's face it, if picocells are the problem, a technology fix will take care of it. But since we are talking about Washington, don't raise your hopes. Its easier to crawl under a stone and hope it all goes away. Don't you wonder about people with power over your life who are unelected? How can we get rid of these people? This is SO frustrating.